Wednesday, September 11, 2013

【禁闻】中石油贱卖国产 〝周姓自然人〞水深

免翻 墙 直连本站 tiny.cc/jinnews

2013年09月12日讯】中石油集团贪腐事件再爆案外案,不仅公司高层 接连被抓,最近又传出旗下子公司有低价贱卖国家资产之嫌,幕后最大受益者是〝周姓自然人〞,而且一向谨慎的大陆 媒体还点出了涉案人周峰和周玲英的名字。一时间,〝周姓自然人 〞到底是谁,幕后牵涉到什么人,引发外界关注和猜测。请看报导。


9月10号,大陆多家媒体转载了《21世纪经济报导》的一篇文章 ,文章标题为《传中石油子公司涉国资流失 周姓自然人受益最大》。


根据大陆A股上市公司〝发展〞揭露,中石油旗下的〝四川华油集团有限责任公司〞在与邛崃市〝鸿丰钾矿肥有限责任公司〞的股权构成中,有故意流失国有资产的嫌疑,叫做周峰的自然人则被认为是幕后的最大受益者。


〝鸿丰钾肥〞是由〝鸿丰投资〞与〝华油〞共同出资设立,其中前者出资2.7亿元占9成,〝四川华油〞占一成。


资料显示,截至2011年6月30号,〝鸿丰钾肥〞的资产预估中,帐目价值为5071.25万元,但对无形资产预估的价值却到了7.6亿,预估增值了7.12亿,增值率高达14倍。其中,最核心的增值资产是平落坝的采矿权,从帐目价值仅有300.41万元增值到7.15亿,预估增值率高达236倍之多。


值得注意的是,〝鸿丰钾肥〞的探矿权是由〝四川华油〞仅作价3000万投入的。


上海一位基金经理直言,〝‘四川华油’将探矿权作价投入并且只占10%的股权,这真令人看不懂。〞因为,一个矿产企业的核心资源,就是探矿权和采矿证。


一位矿业上市公司董事也指出,〝四川华油〞不可能不知道其中的价值,仅作价入股10%的确说不过去。


显然,原本属于〝中石油〞的丰厚权益,却变成了上述自然人的〝摇钱树〞。


中国 问题 独立评论员李善鉴:〝整个一连串的过程,它不是一个正常经营的一个决策过程,而它坚定的目的就是要坚决的把钱转出去,把钱从国家交到个人的腰包里。谁能做得了这个事情?〞


不过诡异的还是〝鸿丰投资〞的背景。


资料显示,〝鸿丰投资〞成立于2005年3月,〝东骏集团有限公司〞出资4900万元,占比49%;〝北京宏汉投资有限公司〞出资4300万元,占比43%。〝北京宏汉〞是周玲英100%控股。


根据北京工商局资料显示,〝鸿丰投资〞和北京宏汉的注册地分别为北京市东城区新保利大厦17层的17A1单元和17层17B1单元。


不过,《21世纪经济报导》点出,大股东〝东骏集团〞不是〝鸿丰钾肥〞的实际控制人,背后实际控制人是〝北京宏汉〞的董事长周峰,周玲英只是代周峰持股,周峰实际控制的股权数量远大于〝东骏集团〞。


一位自称〝BS的小职员〞的金融人士根据〝江苏龙成事务所〞业务信息指出,周玲英是前中央、中央政法委书记的胞妹!


南加州大学公共政策博士叶科:〝现在直接又到了周姓的自然人和英——他的胞妹,这些都是与周永康非常紧密关系的家人或者亲属。所以说,调查已经步步逼近,周永康处境已经非常危险,越来越脱不了干系。〞


美国南加州大学公共政策博士叶科指出,中共先抓捕了周永康〝中石油〞的直接下属,再到他的大管家吴斌,以及他的〝钱袋子〞,再到这次媒体又用词非常讲究的提到了〝周姓自然人〞,看来周永康已劫难逃。


李善鉴:〝在甚至把他拿下台之前已经把他这个数目,给他加大到几亿了,相当于这个事情已经给他做实了。将来在判他的时候,没有其他的回旋余地了。〞


不过,这个被四川达州市委书记、市人大常委会主任亲自接见的周锋,能在四川和中石油有如此大的能量,〝周姓自然人〞真实的身份,还需要进一步揭开。


采访/陈汉 编辑/宋风 后制/葛雷


Petro China’s Cheap Sell-Off Needs Full Enquiry


After the explosion of corruption from PetroChina, not only

were the company’s executives arrested one after another,

but rumor has it recently that its subsidiary sold off

state assets at rock bottom price.

Someone, surnamed Zhou was said to be the biggest profiteer

behind the deal.

Cautious Mainland media outlets pointed out two guilty parties,

Zhou Lingying and Zhou Feng.

Who is this Zhou and who else is involved in this?

Both questions have attracted attention and speculation from

the outside world.


On September 10, Mainland media outlets re-distributed

an article published by the 21st Century Business Herald.

The article entitled ” CNPC’s (China Natural Petroleum

Corporation) subsidiary involved in selling of state assets,

and surnamed Zhou as the one that profited most.”


According to the mainland A-share listed High-tech

Development Company,

revealed that Sichuan China Oil Group, a subsidiary

of CNPC, and Hongfeng Potash Fertilizer Company Ltd.

were alleged to have intentionally sold off state-owned

assets well below their real value.

Someone named Zhou Feng, the natural person, is

alleged to have profited the most.


Hongfeng Potash was jointly funded by Hongfeng

Investment and China Oil: the former owns 90%

and the latter 10%.


Data shows that as of June 30 /2011, Hongfeng Potash’s

forecast of assets, valued at 50,712,500 yuan, but

intangible assets were estimated to be 760 million, an

appreciation up to 14 times.

One of the most valued core assets is mining rights from

Pingluoba, cost only 3.0041 million yuan but worth

715 million, an appreciation of 236 times.


It is noteworthy that Hongfeng mining rights came from

Sichuan China Oil with a 3 million investment.


A Shanghai fund manager: Sichuan China Oil gave away

its exploration rights for a return of 10% of the company,

which really makes no sense because a company’s core

assets are its mining rights and permits.

The mining directors of a listed company also pointed

out that “Sichuan China Oil” must know the value of

its assets, trading them for 10% of a company is

indeed unjustifiable.

Clearly, these mining rights and permits belonged to

CNPC, but now they go to Zhou in person and

become his money tree.


Li Shan Jian, China issues commentator: “The whole

series of events is not based on normal transparent

business procedures.


And its purpose is to transfer the state owned assets

into the pockets of greedy individuals.

Who can make this happen?”


However, even more strange is the Hongfeng investment’s

background.

Statistics show that “Hongfeng Investments” was

established in March 2005.

Tung Chun Group Limited invested 49 million yuan,

accounting for 49%; Beijing Hong Han Investment

Limited” invested 43 million yuan, accounting for 43%.


However, Zhou Lingying now owns Beijing Hong Han.


Data from the Beijing Industry and Commerce Bureau

shows that Hongfeng and Beijing-Hong Han are both

registered at


Dongcheng District, Beijing New Poly Plaza, 17th floor

unit 17A and 17B1 unit respectively.

However, the 21st Century Economic Report points out

that the major shareholder of Tung Chun Group is not

Hongfeng potash, but Chairman Zhou Feng of

Beijing Hong Han.

Zhou Lingying is only in charge of the holdings for

Zhou Feng, who owns controlling shares in far more than

those of the Tung Chun Group.”


A financial professional in Hong Kong said that according

to Jiangsu Long Cheng, Law Firm’s business information

that Zhou Lingying is the sister of Zhou Yongkang,

former Secretary of Politics and Law Committee!

Dr. Ye Ke, at the University of Southern California, Public

Policy Division, pointed out that now we know the direct

link of Zhou natural person and Zhou Lingying.


They are Zhou Yongkang’s relatives.

Thus, the investigation is closing in on Zhou Yongkang,

who can no longer escape.


Dr.Ye Ke:The CCP first arrested Wu Bin, Zhou’s

immediate subordinate in CNPC, then Zhou’s pocket

book, Jiang Jiemin.


Now media outlets outed Zhou natural person,

and it seems Zhou Yongkang is doomed.

Li Shan Jian: “Before they even get to Zhou, the figure has

already reached billions.

Therefore, Zhou would have no room to maneuver

when judgment day comes.”

However, Zhou Feng, Zhou natural person, was received

by Secretary of Sichuan Dazhou and Chairman of

Dazhou Municipal People’s Congress, and his true

identity needs further exposure.


http://www.bannedbook.org/ Email订阅禁闻



本文标签:, , , , , , , , , , , , ,







via 中国禁闻 - 禁书网 http://www.bannedbook.org/bnews/cbnews/20130912/175307.html

No comments:

Post a Comment